The way in which we conduct ourselves as councilors is important--in the last couple of instances, the council president was completely out of line in trying to shut me down as I attempted to bring an ordinance before the city council to put on our agenda. She was visibly angry and rude. I don't know if she forgot the rules of order that we voted on, or whether it was a willful attempt to deny me the right to add to the agenda. Either way, all councilors are entitled to speak on every ordinance, resolution, or motion. Regarding the violation of the rules of order for the governing body (the consistent shutting down of speech rights, singling out councilors, and pounding the gavel on speech that one disagrees with) here are the excerpts:
11.7 Interruption:
A Council member, once recognized, shall not be interrupted when speaking unless it is to call a point of order or as herein otherwise provided. If a Council member, while speaking, shall be called on a point of order, he or shall cease speaking until the Council President determines the point of order; if in order, he or she shall be permitted to proceed.
11.8 Speaking on an Ordinance, Resolution or Motion, Time:
No Council member shall speak on any resolution, ordinance or any other matter more than three times, or longer than 15 minutes the first time, 10 minutes the second time, and five minutes the third time without the permission of the President.
11.9 Questioning Administration Officials, Invited Guest, Time:
Council members will rotate according to the roll call order to question anyone that appears before the Council. Each member will be entitled to five continuous minutes of questioning before the next Council member is allowed to pose any question or make any comments. A Council member may pass or yield their time to another member of the City Council once the President has approved it.
*I have received numerous comments on my previous post--some I did not publish, because I don't think terms such as "ghettofied" or comments about people's looks, hairstyles, clothing, etc., are helpful to the conversation about Plainfield's future. If you want me to publish your comment, please refrain from focusing on someone's looks, hair, avian qualities, etc.
Yes in OZ's Council there are two potential sets of Parliamentary Rules of Order; Roberts (or alternate less well known Sturgis), or Reid/Rivers. It seems the latter although contrary to the Council's own rules is the one employed. Charitably I would attribute that to ignorance, not a quality one would expect in a city's governing body.
ReplyDeleteOk. But it's hard not to use terms that fit such deplorable behavior.
ReplyDeleteWhere is Corporation Council on this? Shouldn't she be reminding the Council President about these rules? It appears as though Rivers is now a dictator with no reigns on what she can do or say. Should not the Corporation Council remind her that we live in America?
ReplyDeleteI don't know why this is allowed? Any thoughts?
Sounds like Jerry Green couldn't get you ousted, so he gave orders to Bridget and Gloria to shut you down at the council meetings.
ReplyDeleteNazi Germany, Communist Russia, Slave Masters, Plainfield City Council. All intended to abuse power and censure the masses. Sad state.